Ex Parte Otter - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2004-1869                                                                                             
              Application No. 09/738,591                                                                                       


                                                     INTRODUCTION                                                              
                      The claims are directed to a method for making a film for use with a heat transfer                       
              component.  Claims 1, 5, 7, and 21 are illustrative:                                                             
                      1.  A method for making a film for use with a heat transfer component comprising the                     
              steps of:                                                                                                        
                      applying a plurality of polar particulates to a surface of a film;                                       
                      then adhering said plurality of polar particulates to said surface of said film; and                     
                      then adding said film to said heat transfer component.                                                   
                      5.  The method as recited in claim 1 further including the step of applying an adhesive                  
              substance to said surface of said film, and wherein the step of adhering said plurality of polar                 
              particulates comprises pressing said plurality of polar particulates into said adhesive substance.               
                      7.  The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the step of coating an outer                     
              surface of said plurality of polar particulates with a coating.                                                  
                      21.  The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said plurality of polar particulates are one               
              of alumina, zirconia, wollastonite, talc, and titanium dioxide.                                                  
                      As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies upon the following prior art                         
              references:                                                                                                      
              McCulloch et al. (McCulloch)                 3,973,510              Aug. 10, 1976                                
              Kaneko et al. (Kaneko)                       4,421,789              Dec. 20, 1983                                
              Bentley                                      4,848,314              Jul.   18, 1989                              
              Hayakawa et al. (Hayakawa)                   6,013,372              Jan. 11, 2000                                
              Linford                                      6,132,801              Oct. 17, 2000                                
                      The specific rejections are as follows:                                                                  
              1.      Claims 1-4, 20, 22, 23, 26 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                       
              unpatentable over Bentley in view of Kaneko (Answer, pp. 3-4).                                                   


                                                              2                                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007