Ex Parte Coleman et al - Page 4



             Appeal No. 2004-1934                                                               Page 4                
             Application No. 09/819,317                                                                               

                    covalent and ionic binding, adherence, such as with an adhesive, and                              
                    physical entrapment within a substrate (page 6, lines 12-14)”.  An ordinary                       
                    practitioner, faced with the express suggestion of Halverson to ‘affix’ the                       
                    molecules by any desirable method, would have been motivated to select                            
                    the method of Kreisher since Kreisher states “Therefore it is a principal                         
                    advantage of the present invention to provide a rapid and efficient method                        
                    for electroblotting (see column 2, lines 19-21).”  Kreisher continues a                           
                    sentence later to note ‘It is an additional object of the present invention to                    
                    provide a method as aforesaid which obtains high resolution and absence                           
                    of diffusion (see column 2, lines 25-27).’  An ordinary practitioner would                        
                    have been motivated to follow the express suggestion of Halverson to affix                        
                    the molecules using multiple modes and to utilize the mode of Kreisher                            
                    since Kreisher indicates that the electroblotting method is fast, it is efficient                 
                    and it has high resolution, all characteristics desirable to Halverson, in                        
                    particular the high resolution.                                                                   
             Examiner’s Answer, page 6.                                                                               
                    Appellants disagree with the examiner’s conclusions, arguing:                                     
                    One of skill in the art might arguably have a reasonable expectation of                           
                    success in using a porous material (e.g., a membrane or paper) as an                              
                    immobilizing material in the electroblotting method of Kreisher et al.                            
                    However, Halverson et al. not only fail to specifically disclose an array                         
                    substrate that is a porous material, they in fact teach away from an array                        
                    substrate that is a porous material by suggesting that the array includes a                       
                    substrate that provides a preferably non-porous surface (e.g., page 8,                            
                    lines 34-35).                                                                                     
             Appeal Brief, page 6.  Appellants also argue:                                                            
                    ... Halverson et al. disclose high-density miniaturized arrays, but they                          
                    fail to specifically suggest the desirability of transferring molecules                           
                    positioned within a matrix to their substrate.                                                    
                    Further, as discussed herein above, Kreisher et al. disclose a method                             
                    of electroblotting molecules from a gel to a blot membrane, but they fail to                      
                    suggest the desirability of using substrates, as disclosed by Halverson et                        
                    al., as immobilizing materials suitable for use in electroblotting.                               
                    Thus, the art of record fails to suggest the desirability of the                                  
                    combination of Halverson et al. and Kreisher et al.                                               
             Appeal Brief, page 7.                                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007