onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Baumann et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2004 > Ex Parte Baumann et al - Page 1

Sponsored Links



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
           Ex parte HANS-UWE BAUMANN, DIETER SEMMEL and VASIL BARBUNOPULOS            
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2004-2060                                  
                             Application No. 09/891,271                               
                                    ____________                                      
                               HEARD: December 9, 2004                                
                                    ____________                                      
          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 6 through 11.  Claims 4 and             
          5, the only other claims pending in the application, stand                  
          objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim and               
          have been indicated to be allowable if rewritten in independent             
          form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any             
          intervening claims.                                                         






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007