Appeal No. 2004-2086 Page 10
Application No. 09/238,800
speech. Although appellants do not argue the teachings of
Lyberg, or the combinability of Lyberg and Boucher, we find that
because Lyberg does not make up for the basic deficiencies of
Boucher, that the combined teachings of Boucher and Lyberg are
insufficient to establish a prima facie case of obviousness of
claim 8. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 8, 17 and 26 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007