The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SEUNGMOO CHOI, SAILESH MERCHANT
and PRADIP K. ROY
____________
Appeal No. 2004-2095
Application No. 09/384,503
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to
allow claims 15 and 17 through 21. Claims 1 through 14, the
remaining claims in this application, stand withdrawn from
consideration by the examiner as being directed to a non-elected
invention.
The subject matter on appeal is directed to a method of
fabricating “an integrated circuit having a DRAM with an ultra thin
active layer formed on a SOI layer in which a low Ioff can be
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007