Ex Parte Beckmann - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-2097                                                        
          Application No. 09/501,013                                                  

          subject matter are recited in representative claim 1, the sole              
          independent claim on appeal, reproduced below:                              
                    1.  A sound and heat insulation material,                         
               comprising:                                                            
                    a core layer including fibrous material and                       
               having at least one outer surface, said fibrous                        
               material being provided with a fire retardant                          
               additive; and                                                          
                    a covering layer including a foamable material                    
               covering said core layer at said at least one outer                    
               surface, said foamable material being at least                         
               difficult to ignite and foaming at a given temperature                 
               to insulate said core layer from high temperature and                  
               oxygen.                                                                
               The examiner relies on the following prior art reference as            
          evidence of unpatentability:                                                
          Murch              3,934,066           Jan. 20, 1976                       
               Claims 1 and 3 through 22 on appeal stand rejected under 35            
          U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Murch.  (Answer at 3-7.)                  
               Because the examiner has not adequately established a prima            
          facie case of anticipation against the appealed claims, we                  
          reverse.                                                                    
               “To anticipate a claim, a prior art reference must disclose            
          every limitation of the claimed invention, either explicitly or             
          inherently.”  In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d               
                                                                                     
               1  The final rejection of claim 2 has been expressly                   
          withdrawn.  (Examiner’s answer mailed Aug. 27, 2003, paper 12,              
          p. 2.)                                                                      
                                          2                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007