Ex Parte MERRILL et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                     Ex parte JAMES T. MERRILL and JAMES R. BUTLER                    
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-2118                                 
                              Application No. 09/329,502                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before KIMLIN, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to            
          allow claims 1-6, 8-13 and 18-20, as amended after final                    
          rejection.  Claims 15-17 and 21, the only other claims that                 
          remain pending in this application, have been indicated as being            
          allowable by the examiner.                                                  

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention relates to a process for alkylation              
          and transalkylation of polyalkylated aromatic compounds.  As                
          explained by appellants, typically an integrated process is                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007