Ex Parte KOREN et al - Page 4


               Appeal No. 2004-2138                                                                        Page 4                  
               Application No. 08/765,324                                                                                          

                       The spleen cells of mice that were immunized using the soluble and                                          
               electrophoretically purified Apo B, were then used to produce hybridomas according to                               
               standard hybridoma methods.”  Id.  One of the resulting monoclonal antibodies was                                   
               designated HB3cB3.  Id.  “HB3cB3 binds to the epitope near the T2 carboxy terminal                                  
               region of B-100, exclusively, and does not recognize B-48.  The epitope recognized by                               
               HB3cB3 may be conformationally changed or masked by lipids and/or other                                             
               apolipoproteins present in VLDL.”  Id.  Thus, monoclonal antibody HB3cB3 binds                                      
               exclusively to LDL.                                                                                                 
                                                           Discussion                                                              
                       Claim 48, the only independent claim, is directed to a method for making                                    
               antibodies that will react with a lipoprotein regardless of lipid content and conformation                          
               of the lipoprotein, by treating a lipoprotein or apolipoprotein to delipidate, reduced,                             
               carboxymethylate, and solubilize it with a reducing or denaturing agent, removing all                               
               self-aggregated and degraded material, and immunizing an animal with the treated                                    
               apolipoprotein.                                                                                                     
                       The examiner rejected claim 48, together with dependent claims 49-52, as                                    
               containing new matter, i.e., lacking an adequate description in the specification.  The                             
               examiner summarized her position as follows:                                                                        
                       The entire written description support for these method claims [is]                                         
                       provided for on page 27, lines 5-16 (Example 2) and page 47, lines 15-                                      
                       34. . . .  These passages do not provide for conception and written                                         
                       description support for that which is now broadly claimed because [they]                                    
                       do not provide conception by way of written description for (a) immunizing                                  
                       with lipoproteins or generic apolipoproteins so treated; (b) antibodies in                                  
                       general/polyclonal antibodies; (c) subgenus of reducing or denaturing                                       
                       agents; (d) immunization [with] soluble lipoprotein or apolipoprotein                                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007