Ex Parte Mishra et al - Page 2



         Appeal No. 2004-2179                                                       
         Application No. 09/785,919                                                 
              26.  A method comprising:                                             
                   receiving a first command from a remote control                  
              unit in a first format for a first consumer device;                   
                   translating said first command to a second format                
              and forwarding said first command in said second format               
              to said first consumer device;                                        
                   receiving a second command from a remote control                 
              unit in the first format for a second consumer device;                
              and                                                                   
                   translating said second command to a third format                
              and forwarding said second command in said third format               
              to said second consumer device.                                       
              The following references are relied on by the examiner:               
         Fukuda                        5,995,844           Nov. 30, 1999            
                                  (filing date Jun. 20, 1997)                       
         Kitao et al. (Kitao)          6,160,491           Dec. 12, 2000            
                                  (effective filing date Nov. 07, 1995)             
         Schultheiss                   6,195,548           Feb. 27, 2001            
                                  (effective filing date Dec. 02, 1996)             
              Claims 26-28, 30, 33-36, 39 and 40 stand rejected under               
         35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Schultheiss.  The               
         remaining claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.           
         As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Schultheiss           
         in view of Fukuda as to claim 29 and Schultheiss in view of Kitao          
         as to claims 31, 32, 37 and 38.                                            



                                         2                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007