Ex Parte Cutler et al - Page 3


               Appeal No. 2004-2294                                                                                                  
               Application 10/002,343                                                                                                

               teachings of Miyoshi and Mitsui and of  Miyoshi and Nishino to one of ordinary skill in this art                      
               at the time the claimed invention was made.                                                                           
                       Accordingly, since a prima facie case of obviousness has been established by the                              
               examiner, we have again evaluated all of the evidence of obviousness and nonobviousness based                         
               on the record as a whole, giving due consideration to the weight of appellants’ arguments in the                      
               brief.  See generally, In re Johnson, 747 F.2d 1456, 1460, 223 USPQ 1260, 1263 (Fed. Cir.                             
               1984); In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785, 788 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                                       
                       The principal issues in this appeal are whether it would have been obvious to one of                          
               ordinary skill in this art to modify the catalyst of Miyoshi by replacing the cordierite substrate                    
               thereof with the zirconium titanate ceramic substrate of  Mitsui and/or the calcium aluminate                         
               ceramic substrate of Nishino, and if so whether either or both of the said ceramic substrates have                    
               the properties of resistance to alkali metal migration below 1000°C, and a coefficient of thermal                     
               expansion of less than about 25x10-7/°C (25-800°C), which characterize the ceramic substrates                         
               of the claimed catalysts encompassed by appealed claims 1 and 3.  Indeed, there is no dispute                         
               that the catalysts disclosed by Miyoshi satisfy all of the limitations of appealed claims 1 and 3                     
               except for the ceramic substrate.                                                                                     
                       Appellants acknowledge that “Mitsui teaches that in . . . harsh [exhaust gas]                                 
               environments carrier supports made of cordierite and coated with alumina suffer from corrosion                        
               by sulfur oxides, and carriers made of titanium oxide are not heat resistant,” and thus teaches the                   
               use of a zirconium titanate ceramic support “which offers resists [sic] to sulfur oxide and has                       
               heat resistance” (brief, page 5).  Appellants further acknowledge that “Nishino teaches that                          
               carriers made with calcium aluminate, titanium oxide . . . or alumina-coated cordierite do not                        
               have heat resistance and long life,” and teaches “an improved catalyst carrier composed of a                          
               solid mass or core of calcium aluminate” with a layer of titanium oxide formed on the surface of                      
               the calcium aluminate (id., page 7).                                                                                  
                       Appellants argue with respect to the combined teachings of Miyoshi and Mitsui (id., page                      
               5), and apparently would have similarly argued with respect to the combined teachings of                              
               Miyoshi and Nishino (cf. id., page 7), that Miyoshi is not concerned with improving the NOx                           
               trap support substrate, or for otherwise modifying the support, and thus one of ordinary skill in                     


                                                                - 3 -                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007