Ex Parte GANDMAN - Page 2




                 Interference No. 105,109                                                                                                                 
                 Gandman v. Bushuev                                                                                                                       
                          Senior party Bushuev has filed a request for entry of adverse judgment (Paper No. 49).                                          
                 The request is supplemented by a copy of a letter (Paper No. 5 1), represented by counsel in a                                           
                 telephone conference with Administrative Patent Judge Lee as being from the real party in                                                
                 interest (see Paper No. 50), directing counsel to abandon Patent Interference No. 105,109 and                                            
                 Application 09/529,117. The request is granted. It is                                                                                    
                          ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count I is herein entered against                                             
                 senior party VLADIMIR ANDREEVICH BUSHUEV and JURY SERGEEVICH ZEMTSOV;                                                                    
                          FURTHER ORDERED that senior party VLADIMIR ANDREEVICH BUSHUEV and                                                               
                 JURY SERGEEVICH ZEMTSOV is not entitled to its application claims 1-10 and 12-18 which                                                   
                 correspond to Count I (see Paper No. 38);                                                                                                
                          FURTHER ORDERED that junior party's pending request for rehearing of the motion                                                 
                 panel's decision on preliminary motions is herein dismissed as moot;                                                                     
                          FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note                                                
                 the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and                                                                           
                          FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective                                                        
                 involved application or patent of the parties.                                                                                           









                                                                        -2-                                                                               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007