MCNEIL et al. V. LEFEBVRE DU GROSRIEZ et al. - Page 1





                                            The opinion in support of the decision being                                      
                                         entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 
                                                                                                     Paper 23                 
             Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel                                                                             
                     Mail Stop Interference Filed:                                                                            
                     P.O. Box 1450 February 20, 2004                                                                          
                     Alexandria, VA 22313-1450                                                                                
                     Tel: 703-308-9797                                                                                        
                     Fax: 703-305-0942                                                                                        
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     

                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                            


                                     KEVIN B. McNEIL, LINDA R. SCHERZINGER,                                                   
                                     THOMAS A. HENSLER, REBECCA A. MILLER FAXED                                               
                                               and BARBARA A. LUIDWIG,                                                        
                                                        Junior Party, R6 2 0 2M                                               
                                                     (Patent 6,030,690),                                                      
                                                                                             PAT & TM. OFFICE                 
                                                             V. BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                                                                            ANDINTERFERENCES                  
                                CAROL LEFEBVRE DU GROSRIEZ, PIERRE PROBST                                                     
                                                 and PIERRE LAURENT,                                                          
                                                        Senior Party,                                                         
                                                 (Application 09/068,531).                                                    

                                               Patent Interference No. 105,169                                                


              Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              SCHAFER, Adminstrative Patent Judge.                                                                            

                                                 JUDGMENT - RULE 602                                                          
                     LEFEBVRE DU GROSRIEZ filed a paper notifying the board that the involved                                 
              application and patent are now commonly owned by the Georgia-Pacific Corporation and                            
              requested that the board tenninate the interference under 37 CFR § 1.602(a). Paper 19, p. 2. On                 
              February 5, 2004, an Administrative Patent Judge issued an order to show cause why, in view of                  







Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007