HART vs. RAMAKRISHNAN et al - Page 1




                Filed by:       Trial Section Merits Panel                                                                               
                               Mail Stop Interference                                                                                   
                               P.O. Box 1450                                                                                            
                               Alexandria, VA 22313-1450                                               Paper 56                         
                               Tel:  703-308-9797                                                                                       
                               Fax:  703-305-0942                                                                                       

                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                  
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                                        CHARLES E. HART,                                                                 
                                     RICHARD D. KENAGY, and ALEXANDER CLOWES                                                             
                                                             Junior Party,                                                               
                                                          (Patent 5,620,687)                                                             
                                                                   v.                                                                    
                                                  VANITHA RAMAKRISHNAN,                                                                  
                                     MARIA AMELIA ESCOBEDO, and LARRY J. FRETTO                                                          
                                                             Senior Party,                                                               
                                                      (Application 09/003,810).                                                          
                                                        ______________                                                                   
                                                  Patent Interference No. 104,839                                                        
                                                        _______________                                                                  
                Before: LANE, MEDLEY, and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
                LANE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                       


                                                      JUDGMENT-RULE 662                                                                  
                        A conference call was held on 3 June 2004.  Doreen Trujillo represented junior party Hart                        
                and Elizabeth Weimar represented senior party Ramakrishnan.  Hart stated that it would not file a                        
                brief on the issue of priority and that it did not wish to request reconsideration of the decision                       
                denying its preliminary motion 4.  (Paper 44).  As provided by the interference rules, judgment                          





Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007