Interference No. 105,170
SRL, K.K. v. Cedars-Sinai Medical center
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein entered against
junior party SRL, K.K., and that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 2 is also herein
entered against junior party SRL, K.K.;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party SRL, K.K. is not entitled to its application
claims 22, 23 and 26 which correspond to Count 1, and that junior party SRL, K.K. is also not
entitled to its application claims 22-26 which correspond to Count 2;
FURTHER ORDERED that all pending preliminary and miscellaneous motions of
either party is herein dismissed;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved
application or patent of the parties; and
FURTHER ORDERED that because exhibits in support of motions are technically still
not yet due to be filed at the USPTO, the filing by the senior party of its exhibits is premature
and therefore counsel for the senior party shall call Ms. Yolunda Townes or Ms. Sonja Despertt
of the Interference Trial Section to indicate whether the senior party desires to have them back
and if so when they can be picked up by the senior party (the box of exhibits will be discarded if
it is not picked up by the senior party within two weeks from the date of this communication).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007