Ex Parte Mazur - Page 2


             Appeal No.  2004-0394                                                        Page 2                     
             Application No.   09/915,467                                                                            
                    6. A pharmaceutical composition of matter comprising:                                            
                        a first pharmaceutical in an amount potentially teratogenic, and                             
                        a second pharmaceutical in an amount effective as a contraceptive,                           
                        said composition of matter in a unit dose form.                                              
                    The references relied upon by the board are:                                                     
             Hansen et al. (Hansen)             5,120,546                 Jun. 9, 1992                              
             Van Os et al. (Van Os)             5,494,047                 Feb. 27, 1996                             
             Elsayed et al. (Elsayed)           6,045,501                 Apr. 4, 2000                              
             (102(e) date Aug. 28, 1998)                                                                             
             Abrams et al. (Abrams)             6,428,809                 Aug. 6, 2002                              
             (102(e) date Aug. 18, 1999)                                                                             
             Physicians’ Desk Reference (PDR) 1878-1880 (46th ed., Medical Economics Company,                        
             Montvale, NJ 1992)                                                                                      
                                           GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                                      
                    Claims 1, 2 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                     
             over the combination of Elsayed, Abrams and PDR.                                                        
                    Claims 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                   
             the combination of Elsayed, Abrams and PDR in view of Van Os.                                           
                    Claims 6 and 8-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                     
             over the combination of Elsayed, Abrams and PDR.                                                        
                    Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the                     
             combination of Elsayed, Abrams and PDR in view of Hansen.                                               
















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007