Ex Parte Almqvist - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0984                                                        
          Application No. 09/501,970                                 Page 2           

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant’s invention relates to an acoustic headset having            
          groups of buttons disposed in depressions in an arched outer side           
          of an auditory cup (specification, page 1, line 1 and page 2,               
          lines 23-27).  An understanding of the invention can be derived             
          from a reading of claim 6, which is reproduced as follows:                  
               6. A hearing protection in the form of an acoustic headset             
          comprising:                                                                 
               a first and a second ear cup interconnected by a stirrup or            
          headband, said first and second ear cup each have an inner                  
          surface for contacting the ear of a wearer and an outer surface;            
               one loudspeaker in each one of the ear cups,                           
               one microphone for receiving ambient sound,                            
               one radio unit, and                                                    
               one electronic control unit actuable by a button set for               
          transmitting sound to the ear cups from the microphone and the              
          radio unit by the intermediary of the loudspeakers, the buttons             
          of the button set being arranged in groups wherein the buttons              
          within each group are functionally connected to one another and             
          each group is located in a separate recess or depression on the             
          outer surface of the first cup.                                             
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Wieder                   4,620,068                 Oct. 28, 1986            
          Lansang                  5,794,127                 Aug. 11, 1998            
          Sayler et al.            5,923,317                 Jul. 13, 1999            
          (Sayler)                                                                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007