Ex Parte HIRSCH - Page 2





                 Appeal No. 2004-1365                                                                                  
                 Application No. 09/139,808                                                                            

                        Claim 11 is representative of the invention and reproduced below:                              
                        11.  A method for programming a programmable property of a                                     
                        computer-implemented object, comprising the steps of:                                          
                               displaying for a user, an entry form for editing at least one                           
                        programmable property of the computer-implemented object;                                      
                               receiving a computer language independent functional expression                         
                        generated using the entry form for the property of the object;                                 
                               parsing the computer language independent functional expression;                        
                               generating a computer interpretable function from the expression;                       
                        and                                                                                            
                               storing the function as a run-time value for the property of the                        
                        object.                                                                                        
                                                     References                                                        
                     The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                   
                     Ho                                        5,619,708     April 8, 1997                             
                     McInerney et al. (McInerney)              5,956,479     Sep. 21, 1999                             
                                                               (filed Nov. 13, 1995)                                   

                                                     Rejection at Issue                                                
                        Claims 11 through 13, 18, 22, 54 through 57, 59, 62 through 65 and 67                          
                 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Ho.  Claims 19, 58                       
                 and 66 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Ho.  Claims 52, 53,                       
                 60, 61, 68, and 69 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over                         



                                                          2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007