Ex Parte McCool et al - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not         
           written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
          Paper No. 19                                                                
                                                                                     

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
              Ex parte KELLY McCOOL, DAVID J. HAAS, and GENE L. BARNDT                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2004-1457                                  
                             Application No. 09/696,299                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent           
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-12, which                   
          constituted all the claims in the application.  An amendment                
          after final rejection was filed on September 26, 2003 and was               
          entered by the examiner.  This amendment cancelled claims 3-8 and           
          10-12.  Accordingly, this appeal is directed to the rejection of            
          claims 1, 2 and 9.                                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007