Ex Parte JOKIMIES - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-1677                                                         
          Application 09/028,726                                                       

                                      BACKGROUND                                       
               The invention relates to routing of radio communication                 
          between base stations and terminals in a cellular radio system.              
          In particular, the terminals can be individually controlled to               
          give priority to a particular base station.                                  
               Claim 1 is reproduced below.2                                           
                    1.  A cellular radio system, which comprises terminals,            
               cells, and a network including stationary network equipment,            
               of which said terminals are arranged to set up and maintain             
               radio communication with base stations in the cells, wherein            
               at least one terminal is arranged to favor at least one cell            
               based on data specific to that terminal stored in and                   
               received from the network.                                              
                                    THE REFERENCES                                     
               The examiner relies on the following references:                        
               Wang et al. (Wang)     5,649,289           July 15, 1997                
               Chavez, Jr. (Chavez)   6,018,666        January 25, 2000                
          (filed August 30, 1996)                                                      
               Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2);                   
               Functions related to Mobile Station (MS) in idle mode                   
               (GSM 03.22), European Telecommunication Standards Institute             
               (ETSI), ETS 300 535, May 1996, Third Edition (hereinafter               
               called "ETSI").                                                         
                                    THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1-4, 6, and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)            
          as being anticipated by Chavez.                                              
               Claims 5 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as               
          being unpatentable over Chavez and Wang.                                     


          2  The word "communication" has been inadvertently omitted                   
          in the copy of claim 1 in the appendix to the brief.                         
                                        - 2 -                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007