Ex Parte PORTUGAL et al - Page 7



              Appeal No. 2004-1967                                                                Page 7                
              Application No. 09/027,439                                                                                
              of 40 bases in length.”  Brief, page 5.  This interpretation is entirely consistent with the              
              specification, which teaches that probes “between about 10 and about 40 nucleotides”                      
              in length are appropriate for detection of species-specific or genus-specific nucleotides                 
              by hybridization, while “probes having complementary regions of 15 to 25 nucleotides                      
              are most preferable.”  Specification, page 16.  In addition, while we agree with the                      
              examiner that “the use of the term ‘comprising’ [in claim 55] . . . encompasses                           
              sequences on either side of the defined sequence” (Answer, page 6), we do not agree                       
              that it makes the claim indefinite.  As explained in the specification, probes “may include               
              additional residues, such as additional 5' or 3' nucleotides . . . so long as the sequence                
              meets the [required] criteria” (Specification, page 13), in this case, targeting the                      
              appropriate species of Shigella.  In addition, “[i]ndicator molecules . . . may be attached               
              to nucleic acid molecules . . . at the 3' end, the 5' end, or at other locations on the                   
              molecule” (id., page 14).                                                                                 
                     The examiner also criticizes the term “said molecule” in claims 55 and 56 as                       
              lacking sufficient antecedent basis.  However, we are persuaded that one skilled in the                   
              art would understand that “said molecule” refers to the “fragment . . . of [ ] nucleotide                 
              sequence SEQ ID NO: 3,” 4, 5 or 6.                                                                        
                     The rejection of claims 55-58 under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112, is                    
              reversed.                                                                                                 
              II. Statutory Subject Matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101                                                        
                     According to the examiner, claims 55-58 “do not sufficiently distinguish over                      
              nucleic acids as they exist naturally because the claims do not particularly point out any                
              non-naturally occurring differences between the claimed products and the naturally                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007