Ex Parte Morishita - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                                                                                             Paper No. 22                 

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                         

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                       ____________                                                       
                                             Ex parte FUKASHI MORISHITA                                                   
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                                  Appeal No. 2004-2120                                                    
                                                Application No. 09/987,566                                                

                                                      ____________                                                        
                                                 HEARD:  March 8, 2005                                                    
                                                      ____________                                                        
              Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      


                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 19 and 20.                                      
                     The disclosed invention relates to a level detecting circuit for detecting a difference              
              between a first voltage and second voltage.                                                                 
                     Claim 19 is the only independent claim on appeal, and it reads as follows:                           
                     19.  Level detection circuitry for detecting a difference between a first voltage and a              
              second voltage, comprising:                                                                                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007