Ex Parte BOUILLET et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                              Paper No. 19             
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                     ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                  Ex parte ERIC BOUILLET, DEBASIS MITRA, and                                           
                                  KAJAMALAI GOPALASWAMY RAMAKRISHNAN                                                   
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2004-2127                                                  
                                              Application No. 09/441,693                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
             Before McQUADE, KRATZ, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
             BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                    A patent examiner rejected claims 2 and 3.  The appellants appeal therefrom                        
             under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                                                    


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                    The invention at issue on appeal concerns routing and billing in a packet-oriented                 
             network.  A Service-Level Agreement ("SLA") between a provider of network services                        
             and a customer (i.e., a "subscriber") specifies a minimum quality of service for handling                 









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007