Ex Parte Kriebel et al - Page 1






                                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                            
                                  today was not written for publication and is not binding                                             
                                  precedent of the Board.                                                                              


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            
                                                         _______________                                                               
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                         _______________                                                               
                                         Ex parte ALMUT KRIEBEL, VOLKER NIGGL,                                                         
                                  ERICH PETERS, ROLAND RAUCH and JOSEF SCHNEID                                                         
                                                          ______________                                                               
                                                       Appeal No. 2004-2284                                                            
                                                      Application 09/832,873                                                           
                                                         _______________                                                               
                                                      HEARD: April 21, 2005                                                            
                                                         _______________                                                               
               Before KIMLIN, WARREN and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
               WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                    
                                                         Decision on Appeal                                                            
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally                               
               rejecting claims 1 through 16.                                                                                          
                       Claim 1 illustrates appellants’ invention and is representative of the claims on appeal:                        
                       1.  A process for dispersing fibrous paper stock comprising:                                                    
                       delivering an aqueous fibrous paper stock;                                                                      
                       pressing some water out of the aqueous fibrous paper stock to form a highly consistent                          
               coarse fibrous paper stock;                                                                                             
                       loosening and distributing the highly consistent stock by introducing the highly                                
               consistent coarse fibrous stock into an effective area of a mallet roll having circulating mallets                      
               extending from a rotating shaft which cooperate with fixed peripheral impact sections, thereby                          
               breaking up the highly consistent coarse fibrous stock passing between the mallets and fixed                            
               peripheral impact sections;                                                                                             

                                                             - 1 -                                                                     



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007