Ex Parte GIAMMARESSI - Page 8

               Appeal No. 2005-0129                                                                                              
               Application No. 09/406,353                                                                                        


               fairly suggest the invention as recited in claims 17 or 30 and their dependent claims 18-                         
               22, 24-29, 31-36, and 38-44.                                                                                      
                                                        CONCLUSION                                                               
                      To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 17-22, 24-36, and                              
               38-44 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                          
                                                         REVERSED                                                                





                                     ERROL A. KRASS                                )                                             
                                     Administrative Patent Judge                   )                                             
                                                                                   )                                             
                                                                                   )                                             
                                                                                   )                                             
                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                             
                                     JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO                            )     APPEALS                                 
                                     Administrative Patent Judge                   )       AND                                   
                                                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                              
                                                                                   )                                             
                                                                                   )                                             
                                                                                   )                                             
                                     JOSEPH L. DIXON                               )                                             
                                     Administrative Patent Judge                   )                                             





               JD/RWK                                                                                                            
                                                               8                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007