Appeal No. 2005-0131
Application 09/731,388
connection with a transaction. We find that Eisenhart ‘600
teaches this feature in the form of a buyer (first party)
establishing a privacy policy with a seller (second party) as to
information the buyer will reveal to the marketplace in
connection with a transaction.
Therefore, we will sustain the Examiner’s rejection under
35 U.S.C. § 102 and 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Conclusion
In view of the foregoing discussion, we have sustained the
rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claims 1-2, 4-12, 14-16,
21-22, 24-31, 33-35, and 40-43; and we have sustained the
rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 3, 13, 17-20, 23, 32,
and 36-39.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007