Ex Parte Wilkinson et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0133                                                        
          Application 10/037,390                                                      

          The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                            
          apparatus that make it possible to develop applications for a               
          microcontroller or an integrated circuit card using a high level            
          language and standard programming tools.                                    
          Representative claim 106 is reproduced as follows:                          
               106. A microcontroller comprising:                                     
               a memory storing:                                                      
               a derivative application derived from an application having            
          a class file format wherein the application is derived from an              
          application having a class file format by first compiling the               
          application having a class file format into a compiled form and             
          then converting the compiled form into a converted form, and                
               an interpreter configured to interpret derivative                      
          applications in the converted form and derived from applications            
          having a class file format; and                                             
               a processor coupled to the memory, the processor configured            
          to use the interpreter to interpret the derivative application              
          for execution.                                                              
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Renner et al. (Renner)        5,679,945          Oct. 21, 1997              
          Peyret et al. (Peyret)        5,923,884          July 13, 1999              
          Claims 106-118, 120-128, 130-143, 145, 147 and 149 stand                    
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness              
          the examiner offers Peyret in view of Renner.                               
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            

                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007