Ex Parte Palanisamy - Page 3




             Appeal No. 2005-0142                                                               Page 3                
             Application No. 09/904,246                                                                               


                           an electrical connection including a first contact on said circuit                         
                    board, a second contact on said display panel, and a conductor coupling                           
                    said first and second contacts and extending generally along said plane.                          


                    Claims 1-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over U.S. Patent                    
             No. 6,265,986 ("Oka") and U.S. Patent No. 6,274,391 ("Wachtler").  Claims 6, 7, and 10                   
             stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Oka; Wachtler; and U.S. Patent                             
             Application Publ'n No. 2002/0054037 ("Kawano").  Claims 8 and 9 stand rejected under                     
             § 103(a) as obvious over Oka; Wachtler; Kawano; and U.S. Patent No. 5,253,091                            
             ("Kimura").                                                                                              


                                                    II. OPINION                                                       
                    Rather than reiterate the positions of the examiner or the appellant in toto, we                  
             focus on the points of contention therebetween.  The examiner finds, "Wachtler teaches                   
             . . . a first contact (pad) on circuit board, a second contact (pad 20) on the semi-                     
             conductor device, and a conductor (solder ball 22) coupling the first and second                         
             contacts. . . ."  (Examiner's Answer at 3.)  She then asserts,"Fig. 6 of Wachtler clearly                
             shows the contacts and solder balls are provided extending along the whole plane of the                  
             device."  (Id.)  The appellant argues, "[r]egardless of whether the solder balls are                     
             distributed across the plane, they themselves do not extend along that plane."  (Reply                   
             Br. at 3.)                                                                                               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007