The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PANAYOTIS C. ANDRICACOS, STEVEN H. BOETTCHER, FENTON
READ MCFEELY, and MILAN PAUNOVIC
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-0155
Application No. 09/760,884
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 10 through 22, 29 and 30
which are all of the claims pending in the present application.
APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER
According to appellants (the Brief, page 4 and the Reply
Brief, page 4), “[c]laims 10-23 [sic., 10-22] and 29-30 stand or
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007