Appeal No. 2005-0170
Application No. 09/755,650
transactions on the golf course and thereby having those types of data available, that
would be mere unsupported speculation which we will not do. Therefore, we find that
the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness, and we cannot
sustain the rejection of independent claim 1 and its dependent claims. Similarly, we find
that the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness, and we
cannot sustain the rejection of independent claims 13, 23, 36, 38, 39, 42, 46, 58, 59 and
71 and their dependent claims.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007