Ex Parte Kahlisch et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0234                                                        
          Application No. 09/901,550                                                  

          11. A support matrix for integrated semiconductors, comprising:             
          a frame having at least one bonding channel with an edge formed             
          therein;                                                                    
          conductor track structures disposed on said frame;                          
          contacts, selected from the group consisting of bonding leads and           
          wires, connected to said conductor track structures and disposed            
          in said bonding channel, said contacts used for connecting said             
          conductor track structures to an integrated circuit; and                    
          a barrier formed along said edge, said barrier having a parting             
          agent disposed thereon for repelling a flowable material from               
          said bonding channel onto said frame and onto said conductor                
          track structures.                                                           
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Wiech, Jr. (Wiech)            4,562,092           Dec. 31, 1985             
          Roberts et al. (Roberts)      4,599,636           Jul. 08, 1986             
               Claims 1 through 3, 5 through 7, and 11 stand rejected under           
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Wiech.                           
               Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable by Wiech in view of Roberts.                                   
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 18,              
          mailed June 20, 2003) for the examiner's complete reasoning in              
          support of the rejections, and to appellants' Brief (Paper No.              
          17, filed April 16, 2003) and Reply Brief (Paper No. 19, filed              
          August 22, 2003) for the appellants' arguments thereagainst.                

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007