Ex Parte GOTTLING et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          




                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                     ____________                                                       
                     Ex parte JOSEF GOTTLING, GODBER PETERSEN and RAINER STAMME                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2005-0236                                                   
                                               Application No. 08/642,866                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before FRANKFORT, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3-9,                 
              11 and 14-21, which are all of the claims pending in this application.  Claims 2, 10, 12                  
              and 13 have been canceled.   Claim 11 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.                      
                     We REVERSE.                                                                                        
                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The appellants’ invention relates to a device for cleaning printing cylinders.  A                  
              copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants’ brief.                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007