Ex Parte Herman - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 2005-0328                                                                                                            
                     Application No. 09/723,655                                                                                                      

                     Claim 9 is representative of the invention.                                                                                     
                     9.       A process of manufacture of a MOSgated device comprising:                                                              
                                   forming a gate oxide layer atop a silicon surface of one conductivity                                             
                              type;                                                                                                                  
                                   forming a layer of polysilicon atop said gate oxide layer; etching said                                           
                              polysilicon layer and said underlying gate oxide layer into a plurality of                                             
                              stripes of oxide and polysilicon spaced 1 to 4 microns and overlying said                                              
                              silicon surface; implanting and diffusing a plurality of spaced first base                                             
                              diffusion stripes of the other conductivity type into said silicon surface,                                            
                              using said stripes of oxide and polysilicon as a mask; implanting and                                                  
                              diffusing a plurality of source diffusions into said first base diffusion                                              
                              stripes, using said stripes of oxide and polysilicon as a mask, and leaving                                            
                              invertible channel regions along the outer edges of said first base diffusion                                          
                              stripes; implanting and diffusing second base diffusion stripes into said                                              
                              silicon surface using said stripes of oxide and polysilicon as a mask, to a                                            
                              depth below that of said source diffusions and extending to between the                                                
                              opposite edges of adjacent pairs of said polysilicon stripes;  wherein said                                            
                              stripes of oxide and polysilicon do not include sidewall spacers during                                                
                              implanting and diffusing of said first base diffusion stripes, said source                                             
                              diffusions, and said second base diffusions.                                                                           
                                                                  References                                                                         
                              The references relied upon by the examiner are as follows:                                                             
                     Davies                             5,155,052                           Oct.  13, 1992                                           
                     Ajit et al. (Ajit)                 5,474,946                           Dec. 12, 1995                                            

                                                              Rejection at Issue                                                                     
                              Claims 9 through 14, 21 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                   
                     being unpatentable over Davies and Ajit as set forth on pages 5 through 7 of the                                                
                     answer.  Throughout the opinion we make reference to the briefs and the answer                                                  
                     for the respective details thereof.                                                                                             

                                                                         2                                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007