Ex Parte Beil - Page 2


          Appeal No. 2005-0333                                                        
          Application No. 09/918,074                                                  

                              APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER                                 
               The subject matter on appeal is directed to a fish bait                
          comprising a porous thermoplastic plastic containing at least one           
          fish luring aromatic and/or fish enticing substance and methods for         
          making and using the same.  See the specification, pages 1-3.               
          Details of the appealed subject matter are recited in                       
          representative claims 1, 14 and 18, which are reproduced below:             
               1.  Method for producing aromatic and/or enticing articles and         
          parts thereof, comprising treating a material comprising porous,            
          thermoplastic plastic with at least one fish-luring aromatic and/or         
          enticing substance.                                                         
               14.  Aromatic and/or enticing articles, comprising a porous,           
          thermoplastic plastic treated with at least one fish-luring                 
          aromatic and/or enticing substance.                                         
               18.  Method of luring fish, comprising placing a porous,               
          thermoplastic plastic treated with at least one fish-luring                 
          aromatic and/or enticing substance in a body of water containing            
          fish.                                                                       
                                       PRIOR ART                                      
               The prior art references relied upon by the examiner are:              
          Larsen et al. (Larsen)        3,351,495           Nov. 7, 1967              
          Sibley et al. (Sibley)        4,887,376           Dec. 19, 1989             
          Reinhardt et al. (Reinhardt) 4,957,787            Sep. 18, 1990             
                                       REJECTION                                      
               Claims 1 through 7 and 13 through 18 stand rejected under 35           
          U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of               
          Reinhardt and Sibley.  Claims 8 through 12 stand rejected under 35          

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007