Ex Parte Monti - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0371                                                        
          Application No. 10/210,313                                                  

                                    THE REFERENCE                                     
               The reference relied on by the examiner to support the final           
          rejection is:                                                               
          Monti, Published European    1 164 099          Dec. 19, 2001               
          Patent Application                                                          
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1 through 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)1           
          as being anticipated by the published European application.                 
               Attention is directed to the main and reply briefs (filed              
          August 3, 2004 and September 29, 2004) and the answer (mailed               
          September 10, 2004) for the respective positions of the appellant           
          and the examiner regarding the merits of this rejection.                    
                                     DISCUSSION                                       
               On the record before us, the following facts are not in                
          dispute:                                                                    
               a) the published European application discloses each and               
          every element of the subject matter recited in appealed claims 1            
          through 10;                                                                 



               1 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) provides that a person shall be entitled to a patent unless “(a) the
          invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed
          publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent.”
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007