Ex Parte Liu et al - Page 3


                 Appeal No.  2005-0416                                                         Page 3                  
                 Application No.  09/970,020                                                                           
                        reduce the adverse side effects of nausea and/or dizziness                                     
                        believed to be associated with that enantiomer.                                                
                 The examiner recognizes, however, that while “Gilbert teaches that any                                
                 conventional controlled-release technology can be used to achieve the desired                         
                 tablet formulation[,] Gilbert does not expressly teach the heteropolysaccharide                       
                 and polysaccharide gum excipients formulation” required by appellant’s claimed                        
                 invention.  Answer, page 3.  The examiner relies on Baichwal to make up for this                      
                 deficiency in Gilbert.                                                                                
                        According to the examiner (id.), Baichwal teaches “a free-flowing slow                         
                 release excipient formulation comprising a heteropolysaccharide … and a                               
                 polysaccharide….”3  In addition, the examiner finds (Answer, page 5), Baichwal                        
                 “teaches that the excipients system can be used with a wide variety of drugs that                     
                 are soluble and/or insoluble and that this system is less expensive and easily                        
                 compressed in the preparation of the tablets.”                                                        
                        Based on this evidence the examiner concludes (Answer, page 4),                                
                        It would have been [prima facie] obvious to a person of ordinary                               
                        skill in the art [at the time the invention was made] to incorporate                           
                        the free-flowing slow release excipients formulation taught by                                 
                        Baichwal into the bi-layer tablet that has a controlled release and                            
                        immediate release profile for tramadol taught by Gilbert because                               
                        Gilbert teaches that any conventional controlled-release technology                            
                        can be used to achieve the desired controlled release excipients for                           
                        delivery of an active agent … [that] is inexpensive to manufacture                             
                        and can be easily compressed into tablets which eliminates the use                             
                        of expensive manufacturing equipment.                                                          
                        In response, appellants argue (Brief, page 4), “[n]othing in Baichwal                          
                 suggests use of the disclosed sustained release excipients in two-part                                

                                                                                                                       
                 3 Appellants recognize (Brief, page 3), “Baichwal teaches a heteropolysaccharide and                  
                 polysaccharide gum excipients for controlled release delivery of a drug.”  See also Reply Brief,      
                 page 2.                                                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007