Ex Parte McGrath et al - Page 1


                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           


                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                     __________                                                         
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
                            Ex parte  R. DANIEL MCGRATH, BENNETT H. ROCKNEY,                                            
                              VINCENT S. CLARK and SURINDERJIT S. DHALIWAL                                              
                                                Appeal No. 2005-0429                                                    
                                             Application No. 09/872,209                                                 
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
                 Before HAIRSTON, LEVY, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
                 MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                        This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9.                            

                                                      Invention                                                         
                        Appellants’ invention relates to an integrated imager system that uses                          
                 on-chip logic to generate complex timing on-chip.  The imager system has an                            
                 interface for receiving data, address and control signals, including a mode signal                     
                 for setting the system either to operate using the on-chip timing system or to                         
                 bypass the on-chip timing system and operate using an external timing system.                          
                 The imager of the present invention provides high quality images using an easy                         
                 interface and simple operation in order to reduce time and cost.  The invention                        







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007