Ex Parte Hua et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      



                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                 Ex parte XUJUN HUA                                   
                                         and                                          
                                   MAKHLOUF LALEG                                     
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2005-0440                                  
                             Application No. 09/994,075                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before GARRIS, PAK, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          (2004) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through              
          10, 12, and 20 through 25 in the above-identified application.              
          (Final Office action mailed Feb. 4, 2003.)  Claim 11, the only              
          other pending claim, was also finally rejected but subsequently             
          allowed.  (Examiner’s answer mailed Oct. 9, 2003 at 1.)                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007