Ex Parte Renken et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                                                     


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                 Ex parte TERRY L. RENKEN and MATTHEW W. FORKNER                      
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2005-0515                                  
                             Application No. 10/124,925                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                     ON BRIEF                                         
                                   _______________                                    
          Before GARRIS, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-5,             
          11 and 12.                                                                  
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a catalyst which               
          consists essentially of nickel, copper and chromium and wherein             
          the improvement comprises the further inclusion of tin in the               
          catalyst.  This appealed subject matter is adequately represented           
          by independent claim 1 which reads as follows:                              







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007