Appeal No. 2005-0523 Page 2
Application No. 10/264,733
(Globally Unique Identifiers) GUIDs and even if the first and
second objects have different interfaces.
Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:
1. A method for object oriented programming comprising:
creating a first object having a first identifer, said
object associated with a first client;
providing a second object having a second identifier, said
second object associated with the first client, said first and
second identifiers being different; and
using said second object with said first client in place of
the first object without recompiling.
The examiner relies on the following reference:
Miloushev et al. (Miloushev) US 2001/0037412 Nov. 1, 2001
Claims 1-5, 12, 13 and 15-17 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure of
Miloushev. Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Miloushev taken alone.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the evidence
of anticipation and obviousness relied upon by the examiner as
support for the rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and
taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, the
appellant’s arguments set forth in the briefs along with the
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007