Ex Parte Hir et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2005-0618                                                                 Page 7                
              Application No. 09/760,017                                                                                 



                     For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 1,                    
              and claims 4, 5 and 8 dependent thereon, under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.                             


                                                       REMAND                                                            
                     On page 6 of the answer, the examiner refers to Japanese reference 11-308812                        
              and German reference 198 11 424 (both of record) that have not been applied in the                         
              rejection under appeal.  These references have been given no consideration.  See Ex                        
              parte Raske, 28 USPQ2d 1304, 1305 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1993).  However, since the                         
              examiner noted that a magnet mounted on the outer surface of a commutator is shown                         
              in both references, we remand this application to the examiner to consider if the                          
              pending claims are patentable over each of these references alone or in combination                        
              with other prior art.                                                                                      





















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007