Ex Parte Johnson - Page 1




                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            


                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                           

                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                            

                                                        ____________                                                        
                                               Ex parte PAUL E. JOHNSON                                                     
                                                       ____________                                                         
                                                   Appeal No. 2005-0644                                                     
                                                Application No. 09/804,522                                                  
                                                       ____________                                                         
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                       ____________                                                         
              Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
              HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        


                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 20.                                     
                     The disclosed invention relates to the use of an LED illumination source device in                     
              a flow particle detection device.  An optical element collects nearly all of the light from                   
              the LED, and concentrates the collected light at a selected volume within a flow sample                       
              stream.                                                                                                       
                     Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007