Ex Parte Wiedenhoft et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0657                                                        
          Application No. 10/136,984                                                  

               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                
          method of producing cement clinker in a rotary kiln which adds              
          primary feedstock material into the kiln at a feed end and then             
          introduces a secondary stream of metallurgical slag into the kiln           
          through kiln dust infeed ports situated at a mid-kiln location              
                                                         2                            
          (Brief, page 2).1  Claim 1 is reproduced below:                             
               1.  A method of producing cement clinker using an elongated            
          rotary kiln having a feed end and a downwardly tilted outlet end            
          with a heater situated generally adjacent to the outlet end, and            
          kiln dust infeed ports situated downstream of said feed end at a            
          mid kiln location, the method comprising the steps of:                      
               a)   directing heat from the heater through the kiln and               
                    generally toward the feed end;                                    
               b)   introducing a stream of primary cement feedstock                  
                    material into the kiln at the feed end so that the                
                    cement feedstock material travels toward the heater and           
                    the outlet end while becoming calcined and heated to              
                    clinker-producing temperatures; and                               
               c)   introducing a secondary feedstock of fragmentary                  
                    metallurgical slag into the kiln through said kiln dust           
                    infeed ports so that the metallurgical slag and the               


               1                                                                      
               1All reference to and citation from the Brief refers to the            
          Amended Brief dated Oct. 23, 2003.                                          
               2                                                                      
               2We note that “limestone feedstock” as recited in step (c)             
          of claim 1 on appeal lacks antecedent basis in the preceding                
          portion of the claim (see the primary “cement” feedstock in step            
          (b)).  In the event of further or continuing prosecution before             
          the examiner, the examiner and appellants should correct this               
          error.                                                                      
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007