Appeal No. 2005-0715
Application No. 09/725,428
between Rossin’s catalytic oxidizing step and his caustic
scrubbing step.
Because such a first detector measuring location does not
satisfy the corresponding first detector measuring requirement of
appealed claim 1, the examiner’s rejection is improper for this
reason alone. It follows that we cannot sustain the Section 103
rejection of all appealed claims as being unpatentable over
Rossin in view of Kisters and Tom.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES F. WARREN ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY T. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BRG:hh
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007