Ex Parte Kitchen et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-0778                                                                                        
              Application No. 09/867,587                                                                                  

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     Appellants’ invention relates to a bill availability notification and billing information            
              request.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary                      
              claim 34, which is reproduced below.                                                                        
                     34.    A method for presenting billing information via a network,                                    
                     comprising:                                                                                          
                            transmitting a notice according to an e-mail protocol, via a network,                         
                     indicating availability of billing information;                                                      
                            transmitting a request according to a protocol other than an e-mail                           
                     protocol, via the network, to receive the billing information responsive to                          
                     receipt of the notice; and                                                                           
                            transmitting at least a portion of the billing information, via the                           
                     network responsive to receipt of the request.                                                        

                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Hogan                               5,699,528                           Dec. 16, 1997                       
              Bezos et al. (Bezos)                6,029,141                           Feb. 22, 2000                       
                     Claims 34-38, 40-47, and 49-53 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being                         
              anticipated by Hogan.  Claims 39 and 48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                       
              unpatentable over Hogan in view of Bezos.                                                                   






                                                            2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007