Ex Parte Landau et al - Page 1



              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was               
              not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board.               

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                           
                                       ____________                                        

                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                              
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                      
                                       ____________                                        

                         Ex parte UZIEL LANDAU, JOHN J. D’URSO                             
                                    and DAVID B. REAR                                      
                                                                                          
                                       ____________                                        

                                  Appeal No. 2005-0789                                     
                               Application No. 10/140,001                                  
                                       ____________                                        
                                         ON BRIEF                                          
                                       ____________                                        
          Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                          
          PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                     
                This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                         
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-26.                              
                Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on                         
          appeal, and is set forth below, wherein the text in bold is                      
          for emphasis only:                                                               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007