Ex Parte Vincent - Page 2


          Appeal No. 2005-0859                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 10/015,965                                                  
               a hardware circuit [HARD] allowing an inversion of an order            
          of bits of a word as a function of a value of the convention                
          signal during a transfer of the word between said electronic                
          module [MOD] and said microprocessor [PRC].                                 
          9.   A data-processing system, comprising:                                  
               a hardware circuit [HARD];                                             
               a communication device [COM] for communicating a contention            
          [sic, convention] signal and a word to said hardware circuit                
          [HARD] from one of a microprocessor [PRC] and an electronic                 
          module [MOD]; and                                                           
               wherein said hardware circuit includes means for                       
          implementing one of a direct convention and an indirect                     
          convention of an order of bits of the words as a function of a              
          value of the convention signal.                                             
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Muwafi et al. (Muwafi)          5,978,822          Nov.  2, 1999            
          Van Rensburg et al.        US 2003/0004891 A1      Jan.  2, 2003            
               (Van Rensburg)                     (PCT filed Jan. 29, 2001)           
          Chiang                          6,574,776          Jun.  3, 2003)           
          (filed Apr.  9, 1999)                                                       
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1, 3, 5, 7                
          and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Chiang; claims 2           
          and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Chiang in view of Van           
          Rensburg; and claims 4 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious               
          over Chiang in view of Muwafi.                                              
                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse the aforementioned rejections.                              
               Independent claims 1 and 5 require a hardware circuit that             
          allows an inversion of an order of bits of a word as a function             
          of a value of a convention signal during a transfer of a word               
          between an electronic module and a microprocessor.  Independent             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007