The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENT L. CHRISTOPHER
____________
Appeal No. 2005-0980
Application No. 09/818,228
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1
through 4, 6 through 17, 19 through 23, and 26 through 28. Claims 5, 18, 24 and 25, the
other remaining claims in the above-identified application, are no longer the subject of this
appeal since they are no longer rejected by the examiner. See the Answer, page 2. We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007