Ex Parte Shane - Page 13

          Appeal No. 2005-1115                                                        
          Application 09/269,369                                                      

          apparatus is positioned or the orientation of that apparatus in             
          the container (pages 3-4 and 6-15).                                         
                    So it is with “diffuser 110” of FIG. 7.  Indeed, I find           
          that one of ordinary skill in this art would find in the                    
          specification that “diffuser 110” has “[a]n elongated body 114”             
          to which is fixed “a pair of nozzles 112” that can “extend into             
          the interior of a mixing cylinder (not shown) which is used for             
          receiving the carbonic acid solution from the diffuser 110,”                
          wherein “the carbonic acid solution enters the diffuser 110 under           
          pressure and, as the solution passes through the pair of nozzles            
          112, the pressure differential causes excess CO2 in the carbonic            
          acid solution to burst forth . . . [wherein] [p]referably, the              
          pressure drop is approximately 45 to 55 psi” (specification, page           
          15, ll. 4-9, and page 16, ll. 13-17; italics emphasis supplied).            
          Thus, all of the disclosure refers to “diffuser 110” without                
          regard to the container or any diffusion system containing the              
          same, which view is congruent with the disclosure that                      
          specification FIG. 7 “illustrates a side view of . . . a diffuser           
          . . . having a pair of laterally displaced nozzles adapted to be            
          positioned in a fixed manner in a mixing cylinder” (page 6;                 
          emphasis supplied).                                                         
                    Indeed, the use of the term “diffuser” in the ‘835                
          patent and in appellant’s description of “diffuser 71” of that              
          patent as well as in the description of specification FIGs. 1, 2,           
          3, 5 and 7 in the present application agrees with the ordinary,             
          dictionary meaning of this term: “[a] duct, chamber or section in           
          which a high-velocity, low pressure stream of fluid (usually air)           
          is converted into a high-velocity, high pressure flow.”  McGraw-            
          Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms 570 (5th ed.,             
          Sybil P. Parker, ed., New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1994); see                

                                          13                                          


Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007