Ex Parte Sullivan et al - Page 6




               Appeal No. 2005-1116                                                                          Page 6                  
               Application No. 10/077,148                                                                                            



               Hytrel 4047 (a polyester-based thermoplastic elastomer) or a mixture of 50% Himilan                                   
               1706 (an ionomer resin) and 50% Himilan 1605 (an ionomer resin).                                                      


                       Table 4 of Yamagishi teaches a golf ball (see example E4) comprising a solid                                  
               core made from cis-1, 4-polybutadiene and zinc acrylate; an inner cover layer made                                    
               from a mixture of 50% Himilan 1706 (an ionomer resin) and 50% Himilan 1605 (an                                        
               ionomer resin); and a polyurethane outer cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 53.                                 
               The solid core has a distortion under a load of 100 kg of 3.30 mm.1                                                   


                       It is well settled that the burden of establishing a prima facie case of anticipation                         
               resides with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).  See In re                                        
               Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785, 788 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  Anticipation is                                   
               established only when a single prior art reference discloses, expressly or under the                                  
               principles of inherency, each and every element of a claimed invention.  RCA Corp. v.                                 
               Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir.                                    
               1984).  In other words, there must be no difference between the claimed invention and                                 
               the reference disclosure, as viewed by a person of ordinary skill in the field of the                                 
               invention.  Scripps Clinic & Research Found. v. Genentech Inc., 927 F.2d 1565, 1576,                                  

                       1This is the only golf ball taught by Yamagishi that has an inner cover layer made                            
               from an ionomer resin.                                                                                                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007