Ex Parte Sperry et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         



                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                      
                     Ex parte CHARLES R. SPERRY, NEIL E. RICE, JR.  and SUZANNE SCOTT                                  
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2005-1159                                                  
                                              Application No. 09/760,189                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
              Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
              BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-               
              11 and 13-20.  Claims 3 and 12 have been canceled.                                                       
                     We REVERSE.                                                                                       
                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                     The appellants’ invention relates to fluid dispensers and related apparatus used                  
              to produce on-demand foam-in-place packaging cushions and, more particularly, to an                      
              improved system for delivering cleaning solvent to certain portions of such fluid                        
              dispensers that are particularly susceptible to occlusion due to build-up and hardening                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007